Informujemy, że Państwa dane osobowe są przetwarzane przez Fundację Instytut na Rzecz Kultury Prawnej Ordo Iuris z siedzibą w Warszawie przy ul. Górnośląskiej 20/6, kod pocztowy 00-484 (administrator danych) w celu informowania o realizacji działań statutowych, w tym do informowania o organizowanych akcjach społecznych. Podanie danych jest dobrowolne. Informujemy, że przysługuje Państwu prawo dostępu do treści swoich danych i możliwości ich poprawiania.
Skip to main content
PL | EN
Facebook Twitter Youtube

The European Parliament as a supporter of the LGBT movement and pro-abortion organisations: a summary of the last term

Published: 31.05.2019

Adobe Stock

The upcoming elections to the European Parliament are an opportunity to summarize the most important activities of MEPs over the last term. The Ordo Iuris Institute has prepared a summary list showing the results of votes on the protection of life from conception, the identity of marriage, or the right of parents to raise children in accordance with their own beliefs. The analysis shows that over the last five years the European Parliament’s active support for the postulates of the LGBT movement and pro-abortion organisations has actually grown.

READ THE SUMMARY

Over its 8th term, the EP often spoke about the admissibility of killing unborn children in the Member States, presenting an increasingly stronger support for pro-abortion postulates. In its subsequent resolutions, the Parliament not only promoted the legalisation of prenatal murder, but also, in the first place, started to advocate the “right to abortion” construct as, allegedly, one of human rights.

The key moment was the adoption of two controversial resolutions in March 2015. They stated, inter alia, that women should have had “ready access to contraception and abortion”. In February 2017, MEPs decided that reproductive rights included the possibility of killing an unborn child. In March of the same year, the European Parliament criticised “the excessive use” of conscientious objection clauses in some countries. It happened despite the fact that it is a key human right to act in accordance with one’s own conscience, and be free from coercion to act against it.

Then, in November 2017, MEPs explicitly spoke for a possibility of prenatal murder in cases of serious illnesses. This resolution is an example of discrimination on the basis of disability. Further, in February 2019, the Parliament expressed the view that pro-life and pro-family organisations were, allegedly, opposing human rights.

On a number of occasions over the last parliamentary term, the European Parliament also took a position with regard to the postulates of the LGBT movement. In one of its reports from 2015, MEPs postulated that “family and work legislation [should] be made more comprehensive with regard to single-parent families and LGBT parenting”, which is associated with increasing pressure to take away the legal protection from marriage as a union of man and a woman in favour of institutionalisation of same-sex common-law marriages. What is the more, MEPs expressed their disapproval of educational institutions without co-educational groups.

Further, in March 2018, the Parliament tried to impose on the States the obligation to recognise legal effects of “same-sex marriages” that had been entered into in the States that allowed for such formalisation of the cohabitation arrangement, with all its consequences (including the adoption of children). MEPs also supported initiatives that try to ban psychological therapies of unwanted homosexual tendencies. In January 2019, the Parliament called on the Member States to consider such therapies a crime. This may violate the right to non-interference in private, family and home life, and the right to medical care.

Further, in November 2018, the European Parliament underlined the need to “develop educational strategies” in line with the principles of the gender ideology. This may be contrary to the right of parents to raise children in accordance with their own beliefs. Furthermore, in one of parliamentary resolutions, MEPs considered that the criticism of the Istanbul Convention that interfered with family rights was a manifestation of “hate speech” towards LGBT movement representatives.

“The resolutions of the European Parliament serve as a guide to the actions of the EU institutions, and create the acquis communautaire. That is why, it may be disturbing to see so much support among MEPs of the postulates that are contrary to human rights, the rights of parents, or patient rights,” comments Magdalena Olek, Deputy Director of the Centre for International Law of the Institute for Legal Culture Ordo Iuris.

Life protection

21.02.2020

EU to push pro-abortion agenda in UN – radical European Parliament resolution

The European Parliament has adopted another radical resolution which includes gender ideology, accusations of alleged regressive treatment of women's rights and a condemnation of the US ban on the public funding of pro-abortion organisations, in addition to calling upon the EU to urgently ratify the Istanbul Convention.

Read more

Polish-Hungarian partnership to protect values. Joint declaration of Ordo Iuris and Center for Fundamental Rights

In an age where fundamental values are being undermined, international cooperation to protect them is of extreme importance. A delegation of the Ordo Iuris Institute met in Budapest with the Hungarian legal think tank Center for Fundamental Rights. The two organisations signed a joint Declaration and Accord on Cooperation.

Read more
Family and marriage

18.02.2020

Norway once again violates parental rights, including those of a Polish woman – ruling of the European Court of Human Rights

The European Court of Human Rights found the Norwegian child protection services to have violated parental rights in another in a series of rulings on the subject issued in the past several months. The right to respect for family life was once again infringed upon by the Barnevernet. One of the cases involved a Polish woman whose son was taken away. The Pole was allowed only two visits per year, before being completely prohibited from seeing him despite positive opinions by doctors, psychologists, and kindergarten authorities.

Read more
Life protection

07.02.2020

Ideology under the guise of law – another attempt to introduce radical ideas at the UN

The United Nations forum will witness yet another attempt by radicals to try to push concepts such as sexual and reproductive rights, sex education and abortion into the international discourse.

Read more