Informujemy, że Państwa dane osobowe są przetwarzane przez Fundację Instytut na Rzecz Kultury Prawnej Ordo Iuris z siedzibą w Warszawie przy ul. Górnośląskiej 20/6, kod pocztowy 00-484 (administrator danych) w celu informowania o realizacji działań statutowych, w tym do informowania o organizowanych akcjach społecznych. Podanie danych jest dobrowolne. Informujemy, że przysługuje Państwu prawo dostępu do treści swoich danych i możliwości ich poprawiania.
Skip to main content
Facebook Twitter Youtube

A manipulative report by an LGBT organisation Ordo Iuris responds to accusations against Poland

Published: 08.06.2020


ILGA Europe, an organisation which includes LGBT activists from many countries, has published a report called “Rainbow Europe,” in which it accuses Poland of violating human rights. The publication’s authors make several incorrect claims, including those regarding certain Polish local governments declaring their territories “LGBT-free zones.” They also suggest that it is the Church and the authorities that are responsible for the alleged acts of violence against homosexual people. Presenting the ideologically motivated claims of the LGBT movement as “human rights” and considering the situation of its members solely on this basis seems especially questionable in this regard. The Ordo Iuris Institute has prepared a response to the report published by ILGA Europe.




ILGA’s publication is based on an incorrectly formulated structure of human rights, which has no legal grounding in any international treaties or other documents adopted jointly by the European states. The methodology used in the report is based on these erroneous assumptions as well. According to the authors, the implementation (or lack thereof) of the LGBT movement’s demands is supposed to reflect the “social climate” for people who identify with the LGBT movement in a given country. Moreover, the entire narrative of the report is tied to the controversial claims of gender ideology, primarily the concept of “gender identity.” According to the authors, gender is merely a social construct, which emerged as a result of the “age-old gender war.” A simple consequence of this assumption is the belief that someone’s gender depends only on their subjective feelings.


The report presents examples of alleged discrimination against people who lead a homosexual lifestyle in Poland in an untruthful manner. These include the ruling of the Constitutional Tribunal, which deemed that punishing a print shop owner from Łódź who refused to prepare a poster for an LGBT organisation was unlawful. The man’s decision to refuse service was not caused by the clients’ sexual preferences (which he may not have even known), but rather the content of the poster itself.


The report also presents the activities of the Polish local governments in a manipulative manner. According to ILGA Europe, some local governments in Poland have declared their municipalities “LGBT-free zones.” However, no local authorities have ever issued such a declaration. The report also states that the city of Lublin allegedly issued awards to the opponents of the LGBT ideology. Yet, no such awards have ever been granted; only the Lublin Voivode decided to distinguish some people for “actions aimed at protecting the institution of the family against threats from destructive ideologies.”


In addition, ILGA Europe implies that the Polish authorities restrict the freedom of assembly for people who lead a homosexual lifestyle. The LGBT movement’s demonstration in Białystok, which caused large social protests, is supposedly an example of this. The mere fact that this manifestation could take place proves that freedom of assembly for these people is not being restricted in any way. The authors of the report also claim that several participants of the parade were attacked and beaten. However, neither the Police nor any of the hospitals in Białystok have ever received a report about this.


The Polish law already provides equal protection for all citizens, regardless of their gender or sexual preferences. The Constitution of the Republic of Poland states that everyone has the right to life (art. 38), personal freedom (art. 41), protection of privacy and family life (art. 47), as well as the freedom to express opinions (54(1)), freedom of assembly (Article 57), freedom of association (art. 58(1)) and the right of asylum (art. 37(1)). Therefore, the factors indicated in the report are no reason to include any preferential protection mechanism for such persons in the Polish legal system.


 “Portraying Poland as a country that violates human rights is only possible through the use of manipulative tactics, such as half-truths, misinterpretation of facts, citing opinions as evidence and ignoring the existing laws and legal definitions,” said Filip Furman, Director of the Ordo Iuris Social Sciences and Bioethics Centre and one of the co-authors of the Ordo Iuris’ response to ILGA’s report.

Ordo Iuris fights against manipulation. The Institute sues Agnieszka Holland and Anna Maria Żukowska

Ordo Iuris lawyers have taken legal action against the film director Agnieszka Holland and the leftist MP Anna Maria Żukowska. They have publicly slandered the Institute, claiming its actions are “fascist”.

Read more
Family and marriage


Bulgarians in defence of family. International support for the petition

A coalition of experts and leaders of pro-family organisations from several European countries supported the petition initiated by the Ordo Iuris Institute against the accession of the European Union to the Istanbul Convention.

Read more
Life protection


The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Strategic Plan includes promotion of abortion

Demands of radical ideological circles are gaining support in the United Nations.

Read more
Family and marriage


An unjust letter of European Commission representatives to pro-family local governments. The position of Ordo Iuris

Two representatives of the European Commission sent a letter to the Marshals of the Lublin, Łódź, Małopolskie, Podkarpackie and Świętokrzyskie Provinces, in which they claim that the authorities of these regions discriminate against specific social groups by adopting pro-family resolutions

Read more