Informujemy, że Państwa dane osobowe są przetwarzane przez Fundację Instytut na Rzecz Kultury Prawnej Ordo Iuris z siedzibą w Warszawie przy ul. Górnośląskiej 20/6, kod pocztowy 00-484 (administrator danych) w celu informowania o realizacji działań statutowych, w tym do informowania o organizowanych akcjach społecznych. Podanie danych jest dobrowolne. Informujemy, że przysługuje Państwu prawo dostępu do treści swoich danych i możliwości ich poprawiania.
Skip to main content
Facebook Twitter Youtube

The EP resolution insults Poland and Ordo Iuris. There will be a lawsuit against the European Union

Published: 13.01.2021

Adobe Stock

The resolution of the European Parliament on the judgement of the Constitutional Tribunal on eugenic abortion provoked many comments. It stated, inter alia, that “access to abortion is a human right”, which is contrary to international law. In many aspects, the EP also interferes with the sovereign powers of the Member States, for example, by calling for the “non-publication of the Constitutional Tribunal judgement”. The Ordo Iuris Institute was also defamed in the resolution. Therefore, the Institute announces that it will submit a request to the Court of Justice of the EU and bring proceedings against the European Union.

The resolution “on the de facto ban on the right to abortion in Poland” (2020/2876 (RSP)) was presented as the EP's response to the judgement of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal, which on 22 October stated that eugenic abortion is unacceptable under the Polish Constitution. The document was submitted by a group of MEPs and Robert Biedroń was its rapporteur. The text of the adopted resolution, and even its title, raise serious concerns both in the light of the EU's lack of competence in the matter of the applicable law protecting life in a Member State, as well as numerous ideological references and opinions proving a complete misunderstanding of not only the political but also legal situation in Poland.

The resolution uses the term “reproductive and sexual rights” many times, although it is not in fact included in any binding international treaty. Most often, under its guise, people try to push through acceptance for abortion, vulgar sex education or 'gender' ideology. Despite this, the EP accuses Poland of breaking these “rights” and derives them, inter alia, from the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights, although there is no such phrase in these documents.

Likewise, the EP states, in a completely unlawful manner, that “access to abortion is a human right”. In fact, abortion has never been recognised as a human right and this is due to the deliberate and consistent opposition of various states which have repeatedly opposed attempts to create such a law at the international level. Neither international nor Polish law treats and has never treated abortion as a human right. On the contrary, both legal orders uphold the right to live (including Article 38 of the Polish Constitution, Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Article 6 in connection with the preamble to the Convention on the Rights of the Child). Recently, several dozen countries (including some EU Member States) signed the Geneva Declaration, which once again made it clear that there is a strong voice against attempts to see abortion as a human right.

It is worth to mention that regulations related to both the abortion, which takes lives of the unborn, and legally protecting their life are an exclusive competence of the EU Member States. Any attempt to influence these regulations and especially undermine them is unacceptable. The European Commission has repeatedly confirmed that EU Members States' decision on this issue is exclusive and sovereign.

Ordo Iuris indicates powers and tasks of the Constitutional Tribunal and why the attempt by the EP to “condemn” the judgement on eugenic abortion cannot affect its validity. Similarly, the EP's appeal to “not publish the Constitutional Tribunal's ruling” is an encouragement to violate the Polish Constitution, which directly orders the publication of the rulings of the Constitutional Tribunal, does not provide for any exceptions to this rule and states that rulings of the Constitutional Tribunal are final.

The above-mentioned EP resolution also included an attack on the Ordo Iuris Institute. The organisation was accused in the resolution of alleged “fundamentalism” and “close ties to the government”. This is a clear violation of the Institute's rights and the applicable treaty law of the EU. Therefore, soon the Court of Justice will receive a motion for a declaration that the Parliament's resolution is incompatible with the primary law of the European Union. The Institute also announced that it will bring proceedings against the European Union.

“The resolution of the European Parliament violates the treaty law of the European Union and is a completely illegitimate attempt to exert political pressure on Poland. In the name of ideological postulates that are not justified by the applicable international law, authors of the resolution are trying to undermine the independence of the judiciary in Poland. The Ordo Iuris Institute will take legal steps to show the extremely manipulative nature of the claims contained in this document,” said Anna Kubacka, an analyst at the Ordo Iuris Center for International Law.

Life protection


Istanbul Convention can be denounced soon. Work on bill to be continued

The Sejm decided to submit the citizens’ bill “Yes to Family, No to Gender” to the Foreign Affairs Committee and the Justice and Human Rights Committee. Earlier, MPs did not agree to a complete rejection of the proposal. The aim of the initiative is to denounce the gender-based Istanbul Convention and replace it with the Convention on the Rights of the Family.

Read more
Life protection


Anna Kubacka: Reinforcement of “feminist thinking” and promotion of gender ideology. Illusory consultation for UN report

The United Nations intend to announce yet another ideological document drawn up following consultation burdened with significant manipulation. During the 47th Session of the UN Human Rights Council, a report will be presented, prepared by the UN Independent Expert on violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, Victor Madrigal-Borloz.

Read more
Life protection


Efforts to decriminalise infant homicide in El Salvador. Ordo Iuris protects newborns and unborn children

American pro-abortion organisations try to hinder prosecution of crimes against the life of newborns in El Salvador. The case is being heard by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. It is not the first time these groupings have requested decriminalisation of infanticide and legalisation of abortion in El Salvador.

Read more
Life protection


Ideological pressure from the EP concerning abortion. Unfair opinion about Poland

The Constitutional Tribunal's ruling on eugenic abortion became one of the topics of an analysis of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM), which is a committee of the European Parliament.

Read more