· Amendments to the Public Order Bill are under way in the British Parliament.
· It concerns so-called "safe access" zones around abortion clinics in the UK.
· Similar legislation is currently in effect in Northern Ireland, where areas are created within 150 meters of these facilities, where it is forbidden not only to protest against abortion, but even to pray quietly and talk about alternatives to abortion.
· Earlier, a UN committee declared the action of pro-life advocates "aggressive" and "discriminatory," and called for the introduction of legislation in Great Britain and Northern Ireland banning such actions.
· The Ordo Iuris Institute points out that the implementation of these amendments could consequently lead to the exclusion of pro-life advocates from public debate.
The case had its beginning on March 24, 2022, when the Northern Ireland Assembly passed the Abortion Services Act. Article 5(2) of that act criminalizes "taking action in the safe access area of abortion clinics with the direct or reckless intent to influence a protected person, directly or indirectly." "Protected" persons include clients of abortion clinics, those accompanying them and medical personnel.
The law does not give pro-life advocates expressing their views in the vicinity of hospitals any opportunity to invoke "legitimate justification" for their actions. Accordingly, the Attorney General of Northern Ireland has asked the Supreme Court of Great Britain to rule on whether the said provision exceeds the legislative competence of the Northern Ireland Assembly. This is because it involves a violation of the freedoms of conscience, religion, assembly and expression, which are guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights. The prosecutor pointed out to the court that the situation of pro-life activists is in practice less favorable than, for example, environmentalists blocking public roads. However, the Supreme Court ruled that the law's provision did not violate the rights mentioned.
The United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) also spoke on the issue. In its report, the body pointed to forms of "obstruction" of women's access to abortion in Northern Ireland. Behaviors such as pro-life advocates displaying posters with photos showing the effects of abortion, holding talks with women to change their decisions, or handing them pro-life leaflets were described as "aggressive" in the report. The CEDAW committee deemed the activists' activities "discrimination against women" and called for a law that would absolutely prohibit any activities around abortion clinics and affiliated facilities.
Parallel to the work in Northern Ireland, legislative activity was underway in the UK Parliament on an amendment to Article 9 of the Public Order Act. According to this act, even praying in thought in front of abortion clinics would be banned. Amendment 45 to the act seeks to prohibit, under penalty of a fine, any peaceful attempt to influence a woman who intends to have an abortion to change her mind. According to another amendment proposed in the House of Lords, it would be sanctioned to communicate abortion-related information in a manner that can be seen or heard by a person attempting to enter or leave abortion facilities and is reasonably likely to cause distress. The amendments are currently being considered by the House of Lords. They will then go to the House of Commons, and once approved, royal assent will be required.
- The next step could be to censor the public expression of pro-life views under the pretext of potentially influencing women seeking abortions. The planned amendment could lead to the exclusion of opponents of abortion from public discourse. It is therefore reasonable to conclude that where the law ceases to protect human life from the moment of conception, the remaining members of society will in short order successively lose their remaining freedoms - freedom of speech, conscience and assembly. Without these freedoms, which are the pillars of democracy, the state will lose its status as a democratic state under the rule of law," emphasized Magdalena Mickiewicz, coordinator of the Religious Freedom Center of the Ordo Iuris Institute.
The President of the European Commission delivered her annual State of the Union address at the European Parliament in Brussels. Within the framework of the so-called "State of the Union," Ursula von der Leyen addressed the most important issues related to the current situation in the European Union, such as the European Green Deal, the economy, migration and Russian aggression against Ukraine. At the same time, Ursula von der Leyen stressed the need to further broaden and deepen integration within the European Union.
- A plenary session of the General Assembly of the Council of Europe took place in Strasbourg in recent days.
- During one of the sessions, the General Assembly debated the state of the public health emergency and the need for a holistic approach to health care.
- The Assembly stressed that new threats to public health, perhaps worse than Covid-19, are to be expected. These are to be related to climate change, among other things.
The topic of forced relocation of migrants, including illegal migrants, has returned to politics and the media in connection with the latest proposed regulation in this regard, presented at the EU Council meeting in the Justice and Home Affairs format. According to the recitals of the draft regulation on asylum and migration management, recommendations are to be made indicating specific annual solidarity measures, including relocation and financial contributions, among others, along with their numerical scale.
The International Commission of Jurists recently published a report containing principles which, in its opinion, states should follow in the field of legislation concerning, among others, abortion, drug addiction, prostitution or sexual activities involving minors.