Informujemy, że Państwa dane osobowe są przetwarzane przez Fundację Instytut na Rzecz Kultury Prawnej Ordo Iuris z siedzibą w Warszawie przy ul. Górnośląskiej 20/6, kod pocztowy 00-484 (administrator danych) w celu informowania o realizacji działań statutowych, w tym do informowania o organizowanych akcjach społecznych. Podanie danych jest dobrowolne. Informujemy, że przysługuje Państwu prawo dostępu do treści swoich danych i możliwości ich poprawiania.
Skip to main content
PL | EN
Facebook Twitter Youtube

Parents Take Norway's Barnevernet to European Court of Human Rights

Published: 29.07.2019

Adobe Stock

The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg has received 16 complaints against the Norwegian government from parents. They raise the violation of the parents' right to respect for family life. All of them pertain to the actions of the same institution – Norway's child protection agency, Barnevernet.

The parents have criticised Barnevernet, arguing that the officials have taken their children for no adequate reasons, banning the parents completely from keeping in touch with their children or radically restricting their right to do so. Some of the aggrieved are parents whose contact with the child has been limited to three four-hour meetings a year, a mother who has been allowed to contact her son for only two hours six times a year, a father granted just a single three-hour meeting a year with his own children, and a mother completely banned from contacting two of her children and for whom the right to see her third child has been restricted.

The Norwegian government can now respond to the allegations and non-governmental organisations have been asked to submit their legal opinions of amicus curiae as regards the legal issues related to individual complaints. The Ordo Iuris Institute is going to apply to the President of Section II of the ECHR, which is going to examine the complaints, for permission to take part in the 16 proceedings and to present its observations. The Institute lawyers are going to submit the arguments proving the utmost importance of a parent-child relationship for the proper child development to the Court, as well as present the international case law pointing out that taking children away from their parents is the last resort and ought to be applied in the most extreme cases only.

“The cases to be examined give us a lot of hope for reforming the Norway's childcare system, which assumes the total supremacy of the state over families. The situations described are an example of the application of measures that are totally inadequate to the circumstances the children and their parents find themselves in. In the recent ruling of the Strasbourg Court regarding Blondina Jansen's case, it was clearly stated that placing the child in alternative care serves the purpose of reuniting the family, so the relationship between the child and their biological parents should be maintained. Such a stance gives us the reason to assume that the verdicts in these 16 cases will be in favour of the complainants as well”, Bartosz Zalewski from the Ordo Iuris Institute remarked.

The reasons for which Barnevernet separates children from their parents are often petty, by way of illustration a mother's “chronic fatigue”, a three-year-old's low attendance at nursery school, and a parent's supposed paracetamol overuse. The Romanian-Norwegian Bodnariu family case is one of the most media-covered cases demonstrating extreme anti-family practices of the agency, where five children were taken away (one of whom was barely a few weeks old) and placed in three different foster families. Eventually, Barnevernet bowed to the public and Romanian government pressure and returned the children to their parents, who left Norway shortly afterwards. Recently, the Bodnariu family has filed a complaint to the ECHR, and the Ordo Iuris Institute has also submitted its opinion regarding the case. The Institute's experts have also been developing a report describing Barnevernet's practices from the system perspective, in terms of international human rights standards. Beforehand, they also represented a Norwegian woman Silje Garmo in court, who was granted asylum in Poland. In the court's decision it was directly stated that the woman's fundamental rights had been violated in Norway.

Partisan politicians want to impose ideological censorhip over the European Economic and Social Committee

Left-wing MEPs, including Sylwia Spurek and Robert Biedroń, want to block the work in the EU Economic and Social Committee of Poland's representative, Tymoteusz Zych PhD. In a letter to the committee's authorities, they accuse him of having conservative views and collaborating with the human rights think tank - Ordo Iuris Institute, whose activities they falsely describe.

Read more
Life protection

02.03.2021

Efforts to decriminalise infant homicide in El Salvador. Ordo Iuris protects newborns and unborn children

American pro-abortion organisations try to hinder prosecution of crimes against the life of newborns in El Salvador. The case is being heard by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. It is not the first time these groupings have requested decriminalisation of infanticide and legalisation of abortion in El Salvador.

Read more
Institute Activity

01.03.2021

French website slanders Poland. Ordo Iuris reacts

The French “France Culture” website posted a feature suggesting Poland’s responsibility for the war crimes of the Third Reich. The text was accompanied by photos of flags with swastikas.

Read more
Institute Activity

01.03.2021

LGBT’s activist’s fake news debunked. The Prosecutor’s Office refuses to investigate

The District Prosecutor’s Office in Warszawa-Praga refused to investigate the attempted murder of the LGBT activist Maja G. alias “Lu”. In October 2020, the woman posted a comment on her Facebook profile that someone had allegedly tried to push her under a tram. Supposedly, the reason was that she identified herself with the LGBT ideology.

Read more