Informujemy, że Państwa dane osobowe są przetwarzane przez Fundację Instytut na Rzecz Kultury Prawnej Ordo Iuris z siedzibą w Warszawie przy ul. Górnośląskiej 20/6, kod pocztowy 00-484 (administrator danych) w celu informowania o realizacji działań statutowych, w tym do informowania o organizowanych akcjach społecznych. Podanie danych jest dobrowolne. Informujemy, że przysługuje Państwu prawo dostępu do treści swoich danych i możliwości ich poprawiania.
Skip to main content
PL | EN
Facebook Twitter Youtube

Ordo Iuris reminds ECtHR of the legal requirement to protect life

Published: 22.11.2021

Adobe Stock

· The European Court of Human Rights receives complaints trying to abolish the ruling of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal of 22 October last year and undermine the ban on eugenic abortion in Poland.

· Ordo Iuris Institute became a party in the ECtHR proceedings relating to these complaints, by presenting an amicus curiae opinion.

· The opinion notes that no international law gives anyone the right to abortion.

· There are, however, many international treaties which directly give each human being the right to live.

In July of this year, the European Court of Human Rights issued a formal notice to the Polish government of the receipt of twelve complaints against the ban on eugenic abortion in Poland. This is connected with the Constitutional Tribunal’s ruling of 20 October 2020 stating that the possibility of abortion due to the “serious chance of grave and irreversible foetal impairment or an incurable disease threatening its life” (which included such diseases as Dawn’s syndrome) is unconstitutional, in particular, is contrary to each human being’s right to live. Since then, eugenic abortion has become illegal in Poland.

In the complaints submitted to the ECtHR, a group of twelve women of different age indicated the “potential infringement” of their right to respect private and family life (Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights). One of the complainants claims that shortly before the Constitutional Tribunal’s ruling, she “discovered that she was pregnant” and that “she felt very anxious until she received the test results.” Another woman writes in her complaint that although “she takes contraceptives and does not plan pregnancy” due to bad health, she is still “very worried that the Constitutional Tribunal’s ruling will have an impact on her situation.” All the women complain that they could become pregnant one day with a baby that is disabled.

Ordo Iuris Institute immediately requested that the Tribunal admitted it to the proceedings as amicus curiae. In mid-October, the President of Section One of the European Court of Human Rights, Judge Ksenija Turković, issued a permission. At the beginning of November, Ordo Iuris Institute sent the amicus curiae opinion to the Tribunal in Strasbourg.

The opinion included a reminder that none of the international human right treaties gives anyone the right to abortion; however, nearly each one of them gives everyone the right to live (Article 2 of the European Convention of Human Rights, Article 6(1) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 6 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child). It also quoted the opinion of UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, according to which the laws allowing abortion due to a child’s disability are incompatible with Articles 4, 5 and 8 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

“Our information indicates that the ECtHR continues to receive new complaints against the protection of the lives of unborn disabled children. We monitor the situation on an ongoing basis and we will intervene in future cases of this kind. In the current line of jurisprudence, ECtHR has been taking a peculiar stance; on the one hand it claims that unborn children do not have the right to live, but on the other hand, it recognises that the Convention does not give anyone the right to abortion, either. In ECtHR’s opinion, the question of legalising or banning abortion lies within the so-called margin of discretion of the Member States. So far, the Tribunal has been dismissing the complaints which directly tried to question the national law banning abortion in specific cases,” said Weronika Przebierała, Director of the Centre for International Law of the Ordo Iuris Institute.

 

Family and marriage

29.11.2021

World Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women in the European Parliament was marked by the ideological Istanbul Convention

· The European Parliament held a debate on violence against women and the current situation regarding ratification of the gender-based Istanbul Convention.

Read more

European Parliament supports Poland in the conflict with Belarus

· The European Parliament held a debate on ‘the situation in Belarus and at its border with the EU, and the security and humanitarian implications’.

· The debate was remarkably calm, with the majority of MEPs unanimously supporting Poland’s resistance and condemning the aggressive actions of Belarus.

Read more
Life protection

24.11.2021

Stop ideological neocolonialism. An international coalition against the agreement between the European Union and the Organisation of African, Caribbean and Pacific States

· The European Union intends to sign a new partnership agreement with the Organisation of African, Caribbean and Pacific States (OACPS).

Read more
Life protection

15.11.2021

The EP resolution defaming Poland, adopted on Poland’s Independence Day

· On 11 November, the European Parliament adopted a resolution exceeding its competences and violating the good name of Poland.

Read more