· The European Parliament has adopted a resolution calling for the establishment of a tribunal for crimes of aggression against Ukraine.
· The new tribunal would deal exclusively with the crime of aggression against Ukraine and would complement the International Criminal Court.
· The ICC has jurisdiction to try war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by Ukraine, but cannot rule on the crime of Russia's aggression against Ukraine itself.
· The resolution adopted by the EP was a joint project of all political factions sitting in the EP.
· The EP's position has no binding force, but it is a signal to the European Commission and the European Council that MEPs support efforts to establish the tribunal.
During the January plenary session of the EP, there was a debate on the initiative to create a special tribunal that would have the competence to judge the crime of Russia's aggression against Ukraine. According to international law, not only the crime of genocide and war crimes committed by the aggressor can be prosecuted (in these cases the International Criminal Court - ICC - has jurisdiction), but also the very fact of an aggression (aggression) of one country against another independent and sovereign state constitutes a violation of the law.
UN General Assembly Resolution 3314 (XXIX) of December 14, 1974 defines aggression as "the use of armed force by a state against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations" and states that "aggressive war is a crime against international peace" and that "aggression entails international responsibility."
Also, Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute defines the "crime of aggression" as "the planning, preparation, initiation or execution by a person capable of effectively exercising control over or directing the political or military action of a State, of an act of aggression which, by its nature, gravity and scale, constitutes a clear violation of the Charter of the United Nations." The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg ruled in 1946 that aggression is even "the supreme international crime."
In the case of Russia's aggression against Ukraine, however, the ICC has no jurisdiction. This is because the crime of aggression is defined in the aforementioned Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute. Meanwhile, neither Ukraine nor the Russian Federation has ratified the Rome Statute and amendments related to the crime of aggression (Ukraine has never ratified, while Russia withdrew from these commitments in 2016).
The solution proposed by the European Commission and supported by the EP today is the creation of a special independent international tribunal based on a multilateral treaty, or a specialized court integrated into the national justice system with international judges. Such a court would be complementary to the ICC - it would deal exclusively with the crime of aggression in Ukraine, while the ICC would deal with war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by the Russians in Ukraine. January 19. The EP almost unanimously adopted a resolution in which it supported the establishment of such a court and called on the entire international community to begin work on its establishment without delay.
"Such a step will require strong support from the UN and essentially the entire international community, but it seems feasible. Resolutions to date by the UN General Assembly, the European Parliament and national parliaments seem to confirm the existence of political will to pursue the idea of establishing a new court. Similar steps have been taken in the past - we are familiar with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, or the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg, among others. Today's resolution is only a non-binding declaration, but it is a clear signal to the Commission that Parliament supports the course of action taken by it and the European Council," commented Anna Kubacka of the Ordo Iuris Center for International Law.
· The European Parliament has adopted the resolution "Report on human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union's policy in this regard - Annual Report 2022."
· In an attempt to pursue an ideological agenda, the EP makes mutually exclusive demands in its report.
· The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg has ruled that Council of Europe states have an obligation "to legally recognize and protect same-sex unions."
· The Grand Chamber upheld a contested 2021 ECHR ruling, which indicated that denying same-sex couples the opportunity to enter into "marriage," or at least a formal union, would violate Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The WHO's Intergovernmental Negotiating Body is continuing work on a draft of the so-called "anti-pandemic treaty. The next draft replicates the document's previously stated goals, such as establishing a central role for WHO in coordinating health policy and coordinating scientific information. During discussions, the need to take into account so-called reproductive rights was emphasized.
· The Human Rights Council Forum on Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law took place at UN headquarters in Geneva.
· The event was attended by representatives of states and specialized UN agencies, academics and NGOs.
· This year's Forum was dedicated to discussing ways to strengthen democracy and the rule of law in a post-pandemic perspective.