· Bulgaria's Supreme Court has ruled that "gender reassignment" through legal proceedings is inadmissible under Bulgaria's current state of the law.
· The Supreme Court stressed that "gender is recognized at birth and defines a person until death."
· The ruling also pointed out that a person's "change of sex" would have a negative impact on his or her eventual spouse and children, and could lead to a mutual formal relationship between persons of the same sex inherent in marriage, which would be contrary to the Bulgarian Constitution.
· The Supreme Court also said that it would be up to the legislature, not the courts, to regulate the recognition of "gender reassignment," if any.
Bulgaria's Supreme Court noted that: "the substantive law in force on the territory of the Republic of Bulgaria does not provide for the possibility to carry out, by means of judicial proceedings, based on the provisions of the Law on Population Registration, the change of data on gender, name and surname and uniform civil number in the civil status records of an applicant claiming to be a transgender person." This ruling ends a period of divergence in legal doctrine and inconsistent jurisprudence. Until now, in addition to rulings recognizing the impossibility of "gender reassignment," there have been some that allowed it.
The Supreme Court's interpretive ruling came two years after the Bulgarian Constitutional Court ruled that the concept of gender, according to the Constitution, should be understood only in a biological sense, marking a return to the fundamental principles of law. Following this judgment, the Supreme Court pointed out that "the Constitution and all Bulgarian legislation are based on an understanding of the binary nature of the human species, gender is recognized at birth and determines a person until death, has a significant impact on many aspects of life, and determines the constitutional status of persons in social relations, including within the institutions of marriage, family and motherhood."
The Bulgarian Supreme Court also pointed out that a person's legal "gender reassignment" also affects others - his or her children and spouse, and could negatively affect children and would lead to the constitutionally impermissible existence between persons of the same sex of the mutual formal relationship inherent in marriage. Both the Bulgarian Constitutional Court and now the Bulgarian Supreme Court state that whether a person who considers himself "transgender" can legally "change sex" is up to the legislature.
"The ability to regulate the conditions and consequences of an individual's self-identification with the opposite sex does not belong to the court. Resolving this issue requires scientific judgment in more than one field of knowledge (biology, medicine, psychology, sociology, ethics, law). Only the legislature has the legitimacy to do so when considering the various scientific views and the values on which society operates." - concludes the majority of the Bulgarian Supreme Court's ruling panel.
"The Bulgarian Supreme Court's ruling is another example of the country's commitment to universal and objective principles and the natural social order. Earlier, the Constitutional Court there ruled that the Istanbul Convention was incompatible with the Bulgarian Constitution, aptly pointing out that the adoption of the gender ideology on which the Convention is based makes it impossible in practice to effectively combat violence against women. The recent Supreme Court ruling also stands up for human nature, creating a dam in the way of the process of deconstructing gender categories," notes attorney Katarzyna Klimowicz, an analyst at the Ordo Iuris Institute.
Judgment of February 20, 2023 (ref. 2/2020)
· The Constitutional Court of Hungary ruled that a newspaper had the right to criticise a collection of fairy tales containing homosexual themes, published by an LGBT association.
· The case concerned a lawsuit by the organisation, which accused the editors of violating its personal rights.
· At a formal ceremony held in Samoa, as many as 35 countries of the Organisation of African, Caribbean and Pacific States (OACPS) refused to sign the agreement with the European Union.
· The agreement pushes the concept of so-called reproductive and sexual rights and gender theory.
· The District Court in Kraków has dismissed IKEA's appeal against a judgment ordering the reinstatement of Janusz Komenda, an employee dismissed for quoting the Bible.
· In December 2022. District Court in Kraków found that the dismissal was unlawful and ordered Janusz Komenda to be reinstated.
· The Court of Second Instance confirmed that the dismissal was unjustified.
- The partnership agreement between the EU and the Organisation of African, Caribbean and Pacific States (OACPS) is due to be signed on 15 November.
- The adoption of the agreement could result in, among other things, the pushing of the concept of so-called reproductive and sexual rights or gender theory.