Over recent months there have been attempts at the local government level in order to undermine the rights of families, including the rights of parents and children, as well as legal identity and constitutional position of marriage, which are all guaranteed by the Constitution. The LGBT+ Declaration signed by the Mayor of Warsaw, which contains a range of ideological postulates, which violate standards of ideological impartiality of public authorities, and the announcement of introduction of permissive sexual education in accordance with WHO standards to schools, which raises reasonable doubts in terms of the constitutional principle of children’s protection against demoralisation, have raised the strongest objections. Similar solutions have been already introduced, first and foremost, in Słupsk and Gdańsk to a smaller extent. In October, leaders of the political LGBT movement used Polish schools in order to conduct a propaganda campaign called “Rainbow Friday” for the third time.
Under such circumstances it is necessary to stand for the values stipulated in the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, i.e. identity of marriage as a relationship between a woman and a man, family and parenthood (Article 18), the right to protection of family life (Article 47), the right of parents to raise their children in accordance with their own convictions (Article 48 section 1) and the right of a child to protection against demoralisation (Article 72 section 1).
We urge all people, families, associations and local governments to adhere to this Charter and to join the defence of these values, striving to ensure that they are complied with by means of issuing legal acts and undertaking measures whose aim is to implement the following solutions:
Constitutional principle of subsidiarity “strengthening rights of citizens and their communities” in relation to the family, which is a natural and fundamental social unit and community of citizens, is realised in the constitutional right of parents to raise their children in accordance with their own convictions (the principle of parent educational priority).The aim of care and educational institution is to support educational role of families in the manner which is not contradictory to the constitutional rights of parents (Article 1(2) of the Educational Law Act).Care and educational institutions cannot replace family upbringing with content which is contradictory to them or which prejudices the natural identity of the family. Unfortunately, in practice, even statutorily guaranteed rights of parents are often ignored in the course of school education.
Local government units should verify if statutory rights of parents are complied with in schools which they conduct, including, in particular, the requirement of obtaining consent of the parents’ council on adopting a preventive and educational programme, as well as starting cooperation with non-governmental organisations, and the requirement of obtaining parents’ consent on the child's participation in extra classes. Local governments should also inform parents about their entitlements.
Local government units conducting schools should create a publicly available and continuously updated document made available in the Bulletin of Public Information and on a given commune’s website, informing about non-governmental organisations allowed to conduct activity in particular schools over three years and on the teaching materials obtained from social organisations which are used in a given school. Thanks to such a solution, parents will be aware of the activity of such organisations in a given school before taking a decision on entrusting tasks related to raising their child to a given care or educational institution, without the necessity to file a separate request.
A given school or institution should provide parents with a possibility to verify external organisations and materials used in the course of the educational process individually and collectively, by means of the parents’ council. Headmaster can express consent on undertaking activity in a given school or institution by an external organisation or on the usage of materials of such an organisation in the course of the educational process only after obtaining positive opinion of the parents’ council and after making available information containing the name and programme of classes, as well as the profile of such an organisation to each parent separately in a manner enabling getting familiarised with the content of these documents.
The mechanism of double verification is justified in the case of extra classes and all other forms of didactic and educational activities of a given school, which exceed core curriculum.
It is unacceptable to earmark public property or public means for projects whose nature assumes undermining constitutional identity and autonomy of marriage and the family, including, in particular, projects implemented within the scope of education. Regulations of local government competitions for non-governmental organisations should be supplemented with provisions excluding earmarking funds for activities undermining the principles of constitutional system or prejudicing the rights of citizens.
Schools and educational establishments should promote and implement the model of integral education as the “support of a child in the development towards full maturity in physical, emotional, intellectual, spiritual and social terms” (Article 1(3)of the Educational Law Act), which in relation to sexual education means that schools should “support an educational role of the family, promote an integral approach to human sexuality, shape pro-family, pro-health and pro-social attitudes” (§ 2 of the Regulation of the Minister of National Education of 12 August 1999as part of such classes and teachers should strive to teach pupils to “appreciate values of the family and to be familiar with the tasks which it fulfils, respect human dignity, search for, discover and strive to achieve life goals and values, which are significant in terms of finding their own place in the family and in the world” (Annex No. 2 to the Regulation of the Minister of National Education of 14 February 2017) from which objections against such forms of education which would present one of these spheres in the manner isolated from others arises, which in relation to sexual education would mean distorting and presenting it only through the prism of sexuality.
Local governments should monitor implementation of this model and intervene when it is violated to the extent permitted by law.
Local government authorities should implement solutions, which allow parents of the youngest children to choose between institutional collective care, home care and other forms of care over a child, thus allowing for meeting different needs relating to care of different groups of parents and children. Such solutions would be also convenient for parents whose children cannot take advantage of institutional collective care.
Creation of each local law act should be preceded by determination whether it will affect situation of families and scope of the rights of parents and children. If this is the case, comprehensive assessment of consequences of regulations within this scope should be conducted. It is particularly unacceptable to limit constitutional and statutory rights of parents, children and families by local law acts.
 Article 16 section 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
 The Educational Law Act of 14 December 2016 (Journal of Laws of 2018, item 996, as amended).
 Notice of the Minister of National Education of 18 December 2013 on announcing consolidated text of the Regulation of the Minister of National Education on the manner of school education and the scope of content concerning knowledge on human sexual life, principles of conscious and responsible parenthood, family values, life during the prenatal period and methods and means of conscious procreation contained in the core curriculum for general education (Journal of Laws of 2014, item 395, as amended).
 Regulation of the Minister of National Education of 14 February 2017 on the core curriculum for pre-school education and the core curriculum for general education in primary schools, including for pupils with moderate and severe intellectual disability, and for general education in first-grade sectoral vocational schools, general education in special schools preparing for employment, and general education in post-secondary schools (Journal of Laws of 2017, item 356, as amended).
Ordo Iuris lawyers have taken legal action against the film director Agnieszka Holland and the leftist MP Anna Maria Żukowska. They have publicly slandered the Institute, claiming its actions are “fascist”.
A coalition of experts and leaders of pro-family organisations from several European countries supported the petition initiated by the Ordo Iuris Institute against the accession of the European Union to the Istanbul Convention.
Demands of radical ideological circles are gaining support in the United Nations.
Two representatives of the European Commission sent a letter to the Marshals of the Lublin, Łódź, Małopolskie, Podkarpackie and Świętokrzyskie Provinces, in which they claim that the authorities of these regions discriminate against specific social groups by adopting pro-family resolutions