Informujemy, że Państwa dane osobowe są przetwarzane przez Fundację Instytut na Rzecz Kultury Prawnej Ordo Iuris z siedzibą w Warszawie przy ul. Górnośląskiej 20/6, kod pocztowy 00-484 (administrator danych) w celu informowania o realizacji działań statutowych, w tym do informowania o organizowanych akcjach społecznych. Podanie danych jest dobrowolne. Informujemy, że przysługuje Państwu prawo dostępu do treści swoich danych i możliwości ich poprawiania.
Skip to main content
Facebook Twitter Youtube

Stop gender, stand for family – an international petition against the adoption of Istanbul Convention by the European Union [VIDEO]

Published: 09.06.2020

Ordo Iuris

The new European Commission declared ratification of the ideological Istanbul Convention one of its top priorities. The document undermines the identity and autonomy of the family, limits parental rights and requires that the authorities eradicate "traditions and customs" regarding the roles of men and women while promoting "non-stereotyped" gender roles. Once the document is ratified, the UE will extend its powers without any basis in the treaties, being able to interfere with the field of family life. That is why civil society organizations from 11 EU member states initiate an opposition movement aimed at protecting family and state sovereignty.

The Istanbul Convention is a document that strikes the foundations of legal systems in many EU member states. It undermines the autonomy and identity of the family and limits the right to raise children in accordance with parents own beliefs. Without any substantial basis it orders the authorities to "eradicate" traditions and customs regarding the roles of men and women. The objective concept of sex is replaced by a vague term‘gender’, which is based on subjective feelings regarding sexuality. By weakening most basic social institutions, the convention eliminates barriers protecting against violence.

The official title of the document and part of its provisions suggest that it is aimed at combating violence against women and domestic violence. In fact, the convention adds nothing new in this respect to the legislation of most EU member states, except purely ideological constructs. Contrary to the facts, its authors see the sources of violence in complementary and diverse roles of men and women. At the same time, the real causes of violence, which, according to scientific studies, include drug and alcohol addictions, as well as conflicts related to family breakdown, have been completely ignored.

The EU Commissioner for Equality, Helena Dalli, in a letter addressed to the Ordo Iuris Institute in early June, left no doubt that the convention replaces the objective notion of sex with a fundamentally different subjective category of ‘gender’. Therefore it might lead to questioning of the legal identity of most basic social institutions. Including marriage. The act also refers directly to the category of "gender identity", which is entirely based on one’s own feelings. The convention also strikes at the right of parents to raise children according to their beliefs - its authors demand the introduction of compulsory education about "non-stereotypical gender roles" in curricula at all levels.

In March, the ratification of the Convention by the EU was announced in the gender equality strategy proposed by the EU commission. The subject matter of the convention clearly goes beyond EU competences. Nevertheless, if the Convention was adopted, it would have priority over non-constitutional legislation of the Member States. Partial application of its provisions would not be possible, as numerous countries that ratified the document are currently doing. In addition, countries that have not ratified the document, such as Bulgaria, Slovakia, Hungary, Lithuania and Latvia - will be subjected to even more pressure to adopt it. It is particularly striking that constitutional orders of numerous EU member states, which clearly exclude ratification of the convention, are openly disregarded by the commission.

That is why civil society organizations from Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain and Hungary are initiating an opposition movement that defends family and state sovereignty. The joint international petition to the President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen, asking to officially withdraw from the plan to ratify the Istanbul Convention is available at


How is Poland “restoring the rule of law”? At the request of Ordo Iuris, the Ministry of Justice has made their Action Plan available

– The Ministry of Justice has made available to the Ordo Iuris Institute the Action Plan on Restoring the Rule of Law.

– This document was presented to the EU Member States and the European Commission by the Minister of Justice at a meeting of the Council of the European Union in February of this year.

Read more
Civil liberties


An Empire of Europe or a Europe of Nations? Hermann Tertsch, Lorenzo Bernasconi, Jean Messiha, and Jerzy Kwaśniewski discuss the planned reform of the EU treaties

A European discussion panel conducted by the Ordo Iuris Institute as part of a conference on the future of Europe organized by TVMN in Warsaw on May 20. The 50-minute-long discussion was centered on the project of reform of the EU treaties adopted by the European Parliament last November and then approved by the Council of the EU in December.

It was moderated by Ordo Iuris Communication Director Olivier Bault and it gathered four participants from four different countries:

Read more
Institute Activity


Conservatives aka Russia. How a Polish left-wing activist spins conspiracy theories.

Mysterious links, the Kremlin, Catholic fundamentalism – Polish pro-abortion activist Klementyna Suchanow continues her crusade against her country’s main pro-family, anti-abortion lawyers’ organization, the Ordo Iuris Institute.


Read more
Civil liberties


Censorship and restriction of the presumption of innocence under the guise of combating violence: a draft EP directive

· A draft directive on combating violence against women is being discussed in the European Parliament. 

· This draft may raise concerns due to its extremely broad definition of ‘violence’, as well as the government’s mandate to censor ‘offensive’ online content or its obligation to combat ‘harmful gender stereotypes’.

· The directive may also entail a restriction of the presumption of innocence in cases of sexual offences, by indirectly presuming a man’s guilt.

Read more